Give Eggs a Break?

Yet another factory farm-related undercover video has been circulating around the net these past couple weeks, this one courtesy of Mercy For Animals.  And while I believe all of these vids have value (because they show the unedited truth of what goes on behind closed doors), this one, in particular, has really struck a chord with a lot of folks.  Why?  I believe for two main reasons.

First, most people still think that eating eggs does not propagate cruelty because they assume that “layer hens” are not killed…they’re only used for their eggs.  (This is not true, by the way.  As soon as they stop producing the unnaturally high quota of eggs that is imposed upon them, their brittle bodies are slaughtered for lower-grade meat products like chicken pot pie.)  They also assume that these chickens run around outdoors in open fields all day and are not subjected to the tortuous protocols that go down, like debeaking, force molting, and extreme confinement.

Second, this video features a practice that has been going on for decades in the egg industry; the brutal killing of baby male chicks.  So brutal, in fact, that it really underscores just how unfathomably ruthless the industry has become in its quest for streamline efficiency and maximum profits.

babychicksBaby chicks…in better times.

Why does this happen?  In modern “farming,” you basically have two kinds of chickens; layer hens, who are used to produce eggs, and broiler chickens, who are used for meat.  Broilers have been genetically manipulated to grow super big, super fast, so the industry can get the most bang for the proverbial buck for their efforts.  Layers, on the other hand, spend their entire lives crammed in a cage with four to six other momma chickens, whose sole function is to crank out eggs. (It has been estimated that one single egg produced by a layer hen represents 30 hours of a chicken’s life, imprisoned in a cage under these conditions.)

Therefore, layer hens remain “normal” size so more can fit into a single cage…which becomes problematic for any males born into the system.  They are obviously of no use as layers and, because they were not born with the freakish genetics of broilers, they are of no use to the meat industry.  Hence, what happens in this video.

Speaking of which, I’ll post it below.  Yes, it’s disturbing, so here’s the part where I’m supposed to invite you NOT to watch it because of how gnarly it is.  But you know what I say?  Watch the motherfucker anyway.  I did, and I’ve seen hundreds of these kind of images and videos.  Why?  Because I don’t think we always need to turn our eyes away from the suffering of the world.  We need to take it in from time to time…really digest it…really remind ourselves of the absolute insanity – the extreme levels of violence and ill-regard for life – that still goes on out there.  (Besides, this vid is not THAT bad, compared to many things I’ve seen.)

Oh, by the way…although this practice is painstakingly hidden from the consumer (for obvious reasons), it is not illegal.  It is literally part of everyday industry procedure.  Grind up a live kitten or puppy and your ass goes to jail.  Grind up 500,000 baby chicks per day, no problem.  It’s just business.  Scope it:

A common response to this kind of thing is: “This is terrible.  From now on I’m going to try to get my animal products from more humane sources.” As a result, some folks view the free-range/cage-free procedure to be the more compassionate choice because the animal wasn’t confined to the brutal world of factory farming prior to his or her execution.  But actually, there are some major holes in this idea, both philosophically and in practice.  Consider the following:

1. Many “organically-raised” or “cage-free” chickens still come from hatcheries that kill all their males.  So by supporting that part of the industry, you are still supporting these practices.

2. There are very broad regulations as to what officially qualifies an operation as “free-range” or “cage-free” and, I assure you, it is seldom as “free” as you might think. They are still largely confined, usually to inhumane degrees.

3. There are still no regulations as to how the chickens are treated, and there are still numerous episodes of abuse along the way (particularly in the trucking and handling end of things).

4. They are often still sold off to the slaughterhouse at the end of their “contribution” time (usually one year) and subjected to all of those atrocities, anyway.

So I say, let’s “Give Chickens a Break” and stop eating their flesh and eggs.  We have ZERO nutritional requirement for eggs or chicken meat, so why support these barbaric practices?

Just a little food for thought, people….



About Bobby Rock

Bobby Rock is a world renown drummer, the author of nine books, and a recognized health and fitness specialist with certifications in exercise, nutrition and meditation. He has recorded and toured with a variety of artists, released three CDs as a solo performer and is recognized as a top drumming educator. He is currently touring with rock icon, Lita Ford. Through speaking, writing and activism, Bobby remains committed to a number of animal and environmental causes. Bobby lives in Los Angeles.
This entry was posted in Veganism/Animal Issues. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Give Eggs a Break?

  1. Trevor says:

    Hi Bobby,

    Do wild chickens only live in a select number of countries? And if so, are these the only places where we would find chickens if farming and/or domestication of chickens did not occur?

    Regards from Australia,


  2. CJ says:


    Allow me to play “devils advocate” if you would in regard to this. The majority of humans have been taught that we are the highest living beings on the food chain.

    1.) If that is indeed the case, why must we not consume something that is “lower” in the food chain.

    2.) A fundamental, but perhaps not so obvious question: HOW does it benefit us personally, and as a species to have compassion for all living things?

    All the best. CJ

  3. Bobby Rock says:

    Trevor –

    By wild, I’ll assume you mean living out in nature without the formal support of humans, correct?

    As I understand it, chickens were indigenous to certain parts of Asia (particularly Thailand) many thousands of years ago and have been domesticated through the centuries (like so many other animals that humans have deemed personally useful). I seriously doubt that we would’ve ever found them outside of Asia if there hadn’t been a concerted effort made to import them. However…don’t quote me on that!

    Beyond that, I’ve heard of wild chickens being spotted in isolated areas but, again, they didn’t wind up there without some serious human intervention somewhere along the way.


  4. Bobby Rock says:

    CJ –

    Question #1: “The majority of humans have been taught that we are the highest living beings on the food chain. If that is indeed the case, why must we not consume something that is ‘lower’ in the food chain.”

    I believe we’ve always confused “having dominion over” with being “highest on the food chain.” Yes, as a race of beings, we have figured out how to control all other animals on the planet (along with large populations of our fellow humans, by the way). But this doesn’t put us at the top of the food chain, in the natural order of things. If you ever want to know where you truly stand in the food chain, just have someone drop you off in the middle of the jungle somewhere without a weapon. You would soon find yourself up in the trees with your fellow primates, eating mangos and being on the lookout for any of a number of predators who could gladly have you for dinner.

    We would obviously have to be carnivorous to be highest on the food chain and we are clearly not, especially when compared to other carnivores. We have none of the physical attributes like they do (claws, fangs, jaw structure, shorter digestive tract, etc.) and, perhaps more telling, we were not mentally wired to kill things (as opposed to our beloved kittens, for example, who will pounce on a bird or a mouse just out of sheer instinct). It seems like any “instinct” any of us have to kill animals is cultural…passed down from the generations before us. But you would be hard-pressed to find a young child whose natural inclination was to kill, dismember, then tear apart and start eating a live animal.

    The point is, there doesn’t appear to be any overriding biological directive for us to kill and eat animals, even though, as more omnivorous beings, we are capable of it. But this capability seems more about surviving than thriving. And in these modern times, it is my belief that not only do we have no NEED to kill, but it is more in line with our highest state of evolution to choose NOT to kill.

    Which leads us into your second question, which is so poignant, I’ll have to make it its own blog entry! Check out 9/12/09.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s